When Mr. Vaidik, a freelance
journalist and a scholar decided to meet Hafiz Saeed in Pakistan, little did he know the kind of furore it will create or maybe he did
know but just didn't realize how wrong it will all go. Now what was wrong in
him meeting a terrorist, journalists all over the world have done it for
decades, given the world another perspective while maintaining an impersonal
stance in the matter at hand. What was wrong was the way it was conducted,
firstly, there was no official authorization for such an interview to take
place and secondly, it seems no recording of the interview was kept and later
no transcript was published, in fact it was not conducted like interviews in
such exceptional situations are, rather it looked more like a rendezvous
between two close aides, for lack of a better word.
Mr. Vaidik, it seems is very clear in
his mind about his intentions to meet Hafiz, the man responsible for the 26/11
attacks among other heinous crimes. As per him, he risked his life by carrying
out an interview and a personal dialogue with the latter. He believes that ending "conflict is possible not through the gun but talks" and so he has played the role of a goodwill ambassador for India by carrying out his own diluted idea of a Track II diplomacy. The fact that he did not have the proper authority to do so has never occurred to him and even if we argue that he was under the capacity of a journalist, his actions are now being questioned by several members of his own fraternity for not carrying out the role effectively.
The government in the meanwhile, has maintained a clear
distance from this fiasco naming it as " diplomatic misadventure of a private individual " whereas the opposition is raising uproar
about it in parliament for continuous two days branding him an anti Indian
among other things and demanding his arrest. Mr. Vaidik though, in the midst of all
this seems pretty unperturbed, confident that he has done the right thing and
the nation will come around, eventually.
Now, being a democracy every individual is entitled to their
opinion and being a journalist one can meet people from every walk of life but
at the same time anyone who is a sympathiser of an enemy of the country is not
to be tolerated under any circumstances, especially when they seem to self
serve their own thirst for becoming famous.
But in this particular case, it just seems that his vanity and his
penchant for fame made him commit such an act, wherein he himself tweeted
photos of the interview and declared to have undertaken such a risk to his life.
It rather seems like a bad episode of Bigg Boss where individuals pull
outrageous acts just to grab attention, though the gravity of this situation is
something that cannot be denied. An action of some sort should unquestionably
be taken if we do not want more episodes of these kinds on our hands (who knows
what kind of information they are passing on to the other
side, albeit unintentionally). And, till that time an action is taken, the biggest satisfaction that we can give ourselves is not to give
him any more of our time.
Vaidik with Saeed (Picture Courtesy: Social Networking Sites) |
P.S.: The views expressed are solely of the author's.
This field will not be able to accommodate my reply i.e. of course something which is not in line with your view in the above blog ... hence I choose not to. However, your writing style, needless to say, as always is unique and its own way brilliant.... unlike your point of view regarding the topic.
ReplyDeleteHi Sayan...thank your for appreciating my writing style...though I would really like to know your point of view on this topic. So please share it here.
ReplyDeleteYou talk about democracy and then you give verdict on your own. Gandhiji talked with britishers numerous times was he wrong as well? Bhagat singh too was called terrorist by some ppl at times. Does it mean he was wrong a well? Little truth do we know about what happens in this country. If everyone was honest patriot our county would be something unimaginable today. I don't think he did anything wrong. Again its a democratic country and it's just my opinion :)
ReplyDelete@ViralShah Yes...i partly agree with you there..it is a democratic country and everyone of us are entitled to our own opinion, just as I am, a verdict would be too harsh a term since I am not any governing authority :)
ReplyDeleteBut I beg to differ on your comparison with Gandhi and Bhagat Singh, they had agendas...clear motives...this guy never did...their intentions were clear ...they were there for a cause they believed in...even if one did not agree with the cause, you have to agree that they believed it
This fellow Vaidik had no motive no agenda other than to serve his own, he himself released the images and all to create cheap publicity...in his interviews, he himself was not clear about the whys and the whos...he is certainly an ignorant fool, and power in the hands of fools is a deadly thing..
And as for the terrorist in question he spoke to...well he might have his own ideologies..am not gonna judge him on that but his methods are wrong...killing innocents is always wrong in my books.
But of course, this is all my opinion. Feel free to disagree. You have the right to :)